Easy way to make a web page

Simple way to create a website

This editor layout is very easy to use and includes several sections:. It is one of the easiest ways to create a website. Select the type of page you are working on, and then select the option you like best. Content lives on the site, and there is no easy way to use it anywhere else.

#10 hints for building easy-to-update websites

That is what a CMS should do for you. Unfortunately, many CMS-based pages are so bewildering that they are updated that they are not touched by those who own them, and the web designers or webmasters need to be included in every one. When you create a new website, make sure you (and your staff) are able to create and modify your own without the need for additional technology.

On the way we learnt a lot about what is needed to provide a great entertainment event for our editorial and sales people. Clear distinction of contents (typically text and images) from style and format. Possibility to modify contents "on site" while viewing the website instead of always having to find the corresponding contents in the main console.

Capability to handle any kind of media composition and link one kind of media to another (e.g. author and article or performer and event). Make sure you use as much textured information as possible. If you have unlimited text, simply place text and pictures on a page. Contents live on the site, and there is no easy way to use them anywhere else.

As this is the most common way for those who are comfortable producing contents for printing, it is used very often. However, it is not the best way to build web contents. If the page is not structured, it is up to the individual who enters the contents to generate the entire mark-up.

If you are using a wavewyg editing program, you will still need to select which headings are s1, which are s2, whether a listing is ordered or disordered, etc. In addition, it makes it virtually unfeasible to automatically re-use your assets. Using structure contents, each item of information is placed in a different box of a data base.

This example shows a very basic data base that makes it much simpler to keep a record of restore organisations, which can then be shown in a well formated automatic record. Never touch the arbitrary HTML page to see the HTML; it extracts the unformatted contents from the data base and builds the HTML to show them.

Organized contents simplify the lives of those who add value and ensure that all pages on the site are consistent. Don't overdo the vysiwyg editing. To make it easy to enter contents, a Kysiwyg editing tool (what you see is what you get) can be great. Typically you''ll have most of your text editing tools wrapping your text into paragraphs (p) tag but you''ll need to add to your headlines your own HTML tag, add your own HTML tag, list your items, etc.

Don't think that a wavewyg editing tool will eliminate everything you need to know to get the most out of HTML editing. It' okay to add fat and italics with a vysiwyg editing tool, but you shouldn't do much more. Fontsize, fontstyle, color, orientation and line pitch should all be determined by the website style used.

You should find the easy way to use one of a few different style options in the Wiki Editorial. You should use witsiwyg text editing only for text segments, not for the page outline. If you have more than one contents area on a page, the page style should define the page style so that the vysiwyg explorer just places the contents into a separate area.

Make sure you have the ability to change to an HTML viewer and verify the source generated by the vysiwygditor. A lot of folks are writing in Word and then adding it to their website. If Word's contents are limited to its own device, it will be inserted as a giant, nasty HTML pad that tries to make the HTML fully consistent with the Word Doc.

The use of Word created HTML also inflates the mark-up (there are hundred of rows of useless text strings for a line of text) and makes it more difficult to work with. The majority of vysiwyg editor have a kind of "paste from word" feature, or at least "paste as text only". This is what you should use if you need to use Word contents.

Regardless of how you divide it up, producing high-quality HTML can be difficult. But the best way to create a lot of web-oriented information is to use a different marking tool - one that is engineered to translate to HTMLutomatically. Authors benefit from these mark-up tongues because they are much simpler to compose than HTML and can be reliably and fully automated into HTML.

It takes a small amount of your own work to make one of these mark-up style second nature, and then you have a way to create high value HTML mark-up without having to type it yourself. Don't let your users dowload these giant data just to let the web browsers scale them to a much smaller display area.

And your CCM system can do the sizing for you but many can't. Make sure the CMS you select simplifies your current imaging workflow and provides the right marker for fast sizing. In the web, contents areas have an intrinsically changeable and unforeseeable dimension and form.

You can do this kind of check on the web using contents areas with constant heights, but it's seldom a good one. Once the altitude is set, the contents must be resized unless using built-in scroll bars (not recommended). Wherever the editor is required to adhere to a certain number of characters, the edit surface should give user input to help the editor reach the correct length.

Typical CMS controls may be okay for basic websites, but as your contents become more sophisticated, it makes things much simpler for your publishers when the controls are tailored to your specific website. They can spend weeks at a time or even a month without processing a particular kind of piece of content, and if you have to chase through menu to find out where you can make a modification, it can be very disappointing.

Adapting the Web site controls makes things easy for your editorial staff by inserting everything in the Web site's native tongue and making the most frequently used Web site features very noticeable. One bad thing about editing contents is the demise of many CMS-based websites. However simple the developer may try to do everything, a content-rich website is not something that should be anticipated from untrained publishers.

Often, one or two hours of individual tuition make a big difference when it comes to the efficiency of your author. During the first meeting we will discuss the concept and show how to work together. In this case, new writers devote some effort to making changes and amendments on their own. During the second course, writers have a better understanding of what to ask and can find out about more complicated work.

Publishers need documentations that are directly related to the functionality of the website - if it is well structured, its contents structure will be adapted, and the documentations should also be adapted. It is also important not to burrow contents writers with documents designed for website builder. There are many things a developer needs to know about a CMS that should never be known to anyone who edits it.

When a CMS does not handle CMS designers and publishers differently, the odds of websites created with it are severely diminished. A lot of websites are created with a CMS, with the intention that website owner will be able to create and modify their own contents. Too often, even though they can make changes themselves, the end result for most, if not all, of the changes is that the changes are made by the designers or creators.

Mehr zum Thema