Genesis Framework SeoSeo Genesis Framework
There are 5 Grounds Why Genesis SEO Must Go Away
Oh, we like Genesis. In general, the Genesis framework is the most SEO-friendly WordPress topic framework on the shelves. I really think it's getting to the point of discarding the Genesis SEO setting. The Genesis preferences are great and they have been helping your website get more traffic.
It' t real, the Genesis SEO preferences are above-average and they are certainly better than if you have no SEO at all on your website. Unfortunately, they are simply not on the same footing as Yoast's WordPress SEO and to be frank, they never will be. It is no mystery that I do not believe that SEO belonged in a subject and Genesis is no exemption.
I think the Genesis SEO preferences are an inefficient item and if you use them on your website you will miss out on some potentially generating marketse. Also, I think that the SEO attitudes contained in Genesis give the wrong idea to humans that all they need to do is move to Genesis to have a perfectly on page SEO.
Whilst the switch to Genesis is a great first move, it certainly isn't the end of the way and removal of the SEO adjustments would help to illustrate that a little more. Well, I don't want you to get the impression that I'm just making a lot of mistakes, so let's go over five Reale grounds why the Genesis SEO preferences need to be deleted.
Yoast's most beloved WordPress SEO plug-in, WordPress SEO, is upgraded on a very consistent base to keep pace with changes in Google's overall service level. On the other hand, Genesis SEO is almost never up-dated. However, the overall design itself is not often refreshed and the SEO part of the framework gets even less noticed.
I think this alone is enough ground not to use Genesis SEO. With Genesis SEO and some SEO plug-ins, one of the major problems I have is that there is no actual response about how well an editor has done implementing SEO on the site. Yoast's WordPress SEO is the only free plug-in that does this right.
Someone new to SEO, who doesn't know how to optimise a contribution, will find that it makes complete business of getting the go-ahead for Yoast. It is of inestimable value to have the files directly in front of you on the WordPress monitor for post-processing. Do not have this kind of feed back is one of the major flaws of Genesis SEO.
Among the most frequent problems we have seen when conducting our WordPress SEO audit on websites that use Genesis SEO is that the custom urls are not properly configured. Genesis SEO, for example, does not provide the necessary rel="next" and rel="prev" link on paged postings, which makes it much less likely that Google will look at the contents of the extra pages of the posting.
Also, Genesis SEO does not process very well paged files and has no options for not referencing them. Since Genesis SEO is integrated into the topic, it doesn't make much point to incorporate any kind of site map feature...... but that's another good thing it doesn't make much point to incorporate SEO preferences of any kind into a topic.
Linking your site map to the remainder of your SEO information makes complete sense, which is why Yoast has added it to its plug-in. Easily change your site's indexing issues by modifying your site's tags and selecting what you want to include in your site map.
Failing to have the capability to have these things under your thumb is another big excuse why Genesis SEO should be outdated. Finally, the last thing you should not use Genesis SEO for is that it offers very little user-defined mail type and taxonomy functionality. User-defined mail and taxonomy are indispensable for any complex WordPress site, and it is also very important to have precise access to your SEOs.
However, not all postal services and taxes are the same. Whilst many should be subscribed and placed in a site map, there are also kinds of contents that should remain concealed from Google's sight due to their thin and/or double character. Let's use the Easy URLs plug-in as an example. Basic urls create a user-defined mail style named "surl" to handle diverted link management.
This mail is searchable by defaults, searchable by index, and displayed in Google results. There really isn't much you can do about this problem with Genesis SEO, and if you use plain web sites to administer your affiliated web sites, it's definitely not a buy. Conversely, if you are using WordPress SEO from Yoast, you can apply a preference to adding norindex to the mail typ.
You can also use the Modify Documents option to prevent Google from accessing the mail via the robot. You can also delete the text from your list in your HTMLitemap. These are just a few examples of the problems that arise when handling user-defined mail and taxonomy items related to SEO.
Also, there are many other similar issues with things like eComerce plug-ins, sliders plug-ins, and pretty much any kind of plug-ins that create a user-defined mail style or taxi. Genesis means SEO sucks? Actually Genesis has one of the best deployments of SEO adjustments within a topic; it just isn't on an equal footing with the best SEO plug-ins anymore.
It' s not upgraded often enough, it can't be simply enhanced with add-on plug-ins, and it lacks a whole bunch of the advanced functionality WordPress SEO plug-ins do. Genesis designers did a great job to build the featureset, but the days for incorporating such things into topics are over.
It' s off to disapprove of the function and begin to move audiences to something like WordPress SEO from Yoast. Wootmes took this step a few years ago and it enabled them to concentrate on what they do best: creating topics and plug-ins. Do you currently use the Genesis SEO preferences?
Do you think they can stand up to plug-ins like WordPress SEO? You think they should keep within bounds?