Web WMains W
sspan class="mw-headline" id="History">History
Web 2.0 Web sites can enable consumers to engage and cooperate in a societal dialog as the creator of user-generated Web site contents in a virtually unified environment, as opposed to first-generation Web 1.0 era Web sites where consumers limit themselves to passively looking at them.
Web 2.0 functionality includes Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions, Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions, Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions, Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions, Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as tags on Web 2.0 functions such as tags on Web 2.0 functions such as tagging on Web 2.0 functions such as keywords on Web 2.0 functions such as Web 2.0 functions such as links, videos, YouTube, video shares, YouTube, hosted Web 2.0 functions, Web application web application software, such as these these. In his third issue of NewMedia Terry Flew described the difference between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0: "Move from face-to-face web pages to blog and aggregate web pages and weblogs, from publication to attendance, from web contents as a result of large up-front investments to an on-going and interacting business cycle, and from web contents managing tools to link mechanisms built on keyword tags of web contents (folksonomy).
" Contents provided by the server's file system instead of a RDBMS (relational data base manager system). Sites created with Side Includes or Common Gateway Interface (CGI) instead of a web app created in a dynamically changing web interface such as Perl, PHP, Python or Ruby. In 2004, the concept began its triumphal march when O'Reilly Media and MediaLive held the first Web 2.0 Webcast.
John Battelle and Tim O'Reilly, in their introductory comments, sketched their definitions of "web as a platform" where application development is based on the web rather than the desktops. It has been suggested that the user activity that generates contents (in the shape of images, texts, videos etc.) could be "used" to add value.
O'Reilly and Battelle juxtaposed Web 2.0 with what they termed Web 1.0. Netscape, in a nutshell, concentrated on the creation of softwares, the release of upgrades and Bugfixes, and the distribution to end-customers. O'Reilly opposed this to Google, a firm that at the outset did not concentrate on the production of end-user softwares, but instead provided a set of services using information such as the hyperlinks that writers of web pages create between websites.
We use this user-generated information to provide a web query for phone numbers using the PageRank algorithms. According to this principle, if enough people are able to view the source or website of a piece of computer hardware, those people will be able to fix any bug or other problem. This means that TIME has chosen the mass of people who have been involved in creating contents on community networking websites, blogging, wikis as well as online and offline mediasharing websites.
The Web 2.0 provides almost all Internet surfers with the same degree of participation to all. Their inability to exclude group members who do not help provide goods (i.e. create a user-generated website) from the distribution of advantages (use of the website) leads to the ability of serious members to limit their input to efforts and "free ride" to the input of others.
Best, says the features of Web 2 are 0: Rich Usage, Involvement, Dynamics, Metadata, Web Standard, and scalability. Other features such as frankness, freedom and community intelligence about the involvement of consumers can also be seen as key features of Web 2.0. A number of sites demand that consumers provide user-generated material in order to gain site accessibility and prevent "freeriding".
This is a bibliography of ways in which individuals can voluntarily participate in improving the Mass Effect Wiki, an example of what kind of contents are created by collaborative workers. In order to allow the user to further interaction with the page, communication such as requesting information from the site to the web site or to the web site itself is disconnected (asynchronously) from information returning to the site.
The Social Web - defined as Web 2. 0 sites have a tendency to engage much more with the end users and make the end users an integrated part of the site, either by creating their profiles, add annotations to contents, upload new contents or add user-generated contents (e.g. private photographs).
Zero bundles the power of client-side and server-side sofware, connectivity, content syndication and the use of networking protocol. Standard Web browser can use plug-ins and enhancements to manage contents and end-customer interaction. The Web 2.0 site provides information retention, compilation and distribution features for Web 2.0 site visitors that were not possible in today's Web 1.0 world.
Autoring The capacity to author and maintain contents results in the collaboration of many writers. Whikiers can expand, reverse, restore and modify each other's work. Categorize your contents by tagging them - usually with one or two words - to make it easier to search. As an example, a registered listener can mark a metallic track as "Death Metal".
A collection of tagged items that have been generated by many people within a system can be described as an "economy" (i.e. a people's taxonomy). Extension software that turns the Web into both an applications engine and a repository. For example Adobe Reader, Adobe Flash, Microsoft Silverlight, ActiveX, Oracle Java, QuickTime and Windows Media.
Signal The use of syndication technologies, such as RSS newsletters, to inform subscribers of changes to contents. The third important part of Web 2. 0 is the Web itself. is a set of on-line resources and forums where individuals can exchange views, ideas, opinions and experience. There is a tendency for Web 2.0 apps to interoperate much more with the end use.
Thus, the end users are not only users of the program, but also participants of it: 59 ] Although designated system software, many of these utilities are utilization platform. It mimics the usability of desktops running Windows based software, offers functions and apps similar to a personal computer and is able to run in any web browsers.
During the 1997-2001 dotcom blister, a number of web-based applications emerged that disappeared after failing to attract a significant number of clients. A lot of people see the distribution of website contents as a Web 2.0 aspect. It uses standard protocol to allow end consumers to use a Web site's information in a different environment (e.g., another Web site, a Web site plug-in, or a stand-alone desktops application).
Dedicated protocol such as FOAF and XFN (both for online networks ) enhance the capabilities of Web pages and enable end user to interoperate without central Web pages. Server often use their own application program interface (API), but they also use default ones (e.g. for publishing to a blogsite or notification of a blogsite update).
By using self-describing messaging and hyper-media as the motor of the state of the use, SET-UPIs should be self-describing as soon as an input URI is known. The Web Services Description Language (WSDL) is the default method for releasing a SOAP applications API and there are a number of Web services specification.
CMP Media filed an action with the USPTO for a trade-mark registration for the use of the word'WEB 2.0' for broadcasting purposes in November 2004. 76 ] On the strength of that request, on 24 May 2006 CMP Media sent an injunction to the British non-profit organisation IT@Cork, but withdrew it two workingdays later.
76] The request of the European Union (which would give Ireland a clear status) was rejected on 23 May 2007. Leap up ^ Blank, Grant; Reisdorf, Bianca (2012-05-01). Skip up to: a for " What is Web 1.0? Skip up to: a by Graham, Paul (November 2005). Hop up to: a pcc d'O'Reilly, Tim (2005-09-30).
O'Reilly network. Skip up ^ Strickland, Jonathan (2007-12-28). Skip up to: a by DiNucci, Darcy (1999). Skip up to: a d e d e r "DeveloperWorks Interviews: Berners-Lee". Skip up ^ "Berners-Lee on the Read/Write Web". Hop up ^ Richardson, Will (2009). Jumping up ^ "What is Web 3.0?
Leap up ^ Berners-Lee, Tim; James Hendler; Ora Lassila (May 17, 2001). Hop up ^ Balachander Krishnamurthy, Graham Cormode (June 2, 2008). Skip up ^ "Geocities - dead metal archive". So long, GeoCities: Leap up ^ flew, Terry (2008). Fresh media: Leap up ^ Viswanathan, Ganesh; Dutt Mathur, Punit; Yammiyavar, Pradeep (March 2010).
Skip to the top ^ "The correct size of the software". Hop up to: a to Knorr, Eric. Hop up to: a o'Reilly, Tim and John Battelle. Hop up ^ O'Reilly, T., 2005. Hop up ^ Hinchcliffe, Dion (2006-04-02).
Skip up ^ "Learn more about Web 2.0". academia.edu. Hop up ^ Best, D., 2006. Hop up ^ Greenmeier, Larry & Gaudin, Sharon. Skip up ^ "What is Web 2. 0 design patterns and business models for the next generation of software". Hop up ^ MacAfee, A. (2006). Hop up ^ Hinchcliffe, Dion (November 5, 2006).
Hop up ^ Chic, S., 2005. Skip to ^ Singer, Jonathan B. (2009). Role and rules of technology in the practice of social work and e-therapy: Work 2.0. Hop up ^ Breakenridge, D., 2008. New media, new tools, new audience 1. edition Skip up ^ "Classroom 2.0".
Hop up ^ Karp, Scott. Hop up ^ Eggers, William D. (2005). Hop up ^ Rusak, Sergey (2009). Skip up ^ "i-Technology Viewpoint: It's Time to Take the Quotation Marks Off "Web 2. 0" | Web 2. 0 Journal". Hop up ^ Anderson, Paul (2007). Skip high ^ Parise, Salvatore (2008-12-16).
"<font color="#ffff00" size=14> ;">Les secrets du l > ; Verbrechen dans un monde Web 2. 0" <font color="#ffff00" size=14> ; Hop up ^ MacManus, Richard (2007). "The mainstream media use of Web 2. 0 Services is increasing." Leap up ^ "Banks use Web 2. 0 to enhance client loyalty". and PNT Trading Services. Hop up ^ Mukherje, Anwesha (June 2016). "The role of social media in tourism marketing".
Skip up to: abc Hudson, Simon; Thal, Karen (2013-01-01-01). "Influence of social media on the consumer decision process. Consequences for Tourism Marketing". Newspaper of Travel & Tourism Marketing. Hop up ^ Park, Jongpil; Oh, Ick-Keun (2012-01-01-01). "This is a case study on social media marketing for travel agencies.
Significance of Social Media Marketing in the Tourist Industry". The International Journal of Tourist Sciences. Skip up to: a b Buhalis, Dimitrios; Law, Rob (2008). "Advances in information technologies and tourist management: 20 years later and 10 years after the advent of the web - The state of eTourism research". Tourist Industry Development. Leap up high ^ Milan, Roberta; Baggio, Rodolfo; Piattelli, Robert (2011-01-01).
ICT in Travel and Tourism 2011. Skip up to: a by Miguens, J.; Baggio, R. (2008). "and tourist resorts. Progress in research on tourism: Skip up to: a w d w Zeng, Benxiang; Gerritsen, Rolf (2014-04-01). "Can you tell us what we know about socially responsible marketing in the tourist industry? Perspectives of Tourist Management.
Hop up ^ Richardson, Will (2010). Leap up ^ Ladwig, Peter and Kajsa E. Dalrymple, Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele and Elizabeth A. Corley (2012). Skip to top ^ "Can eyeOS have success where Desktop.com fails? Hop up "Tech Beats Hey YouOS! Hop up ^ O'Reilly, Tim (2002-06-18).
O'Reilly network. Skip up ^ "Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2. 0: "Nobody even knows what it means"". He is a big fan of blog and wiki and has nothing but good things to say about AJAX, but Berners-Lee disapproves of the word "Web 2.0" because it has no consistent meanings. Skip to top ^ "developerWorks interviews:
Berners-Lee". Skip up to ^ "Bubble 2.0". Hop up Flintoff, John Paul (2007-06-03). Hop up^ Wolf, Gary. Hop up Gorman, Michael. Hop up Terranova, Tiziana (2000). Socio-text. Hop up Peterson, Soren (2008). "Loose Generated Content. Hop up^ Gehl, Robert (2011). Fresh media and society.
Skip, S.A. ^ Andrejevic, Mark (2007). iSpy : Surveillance et pouvoir à l'ère de l'interactivité. Hop up ^ Zittrain, Jonathan. Skip up ^ "Accessibility in Web 2. 0 Technology". It is relatively simple to make web pages available in the web applications domains. However, for Web 2.0 technologies, vibrant contents and unusual viewing can make web barrier test very challenging.
Skip up ^ "Web 2. 0 and accessibility". Often Web 2.0 apps or Web sites are very hard to monitor for those with supporting technologies. Hop up ^ Marwick, Alice (2010). Hop up ^ Jarrett, Kylie (2008). Skip up to: a p USPTO 78322306 number. Skip up ^ "O'Reilly and CMP are practicing the brand on Web 2.0".
Hop up ^ Torkington, Nathan (2006-05-26). O'Reilly Radar. Skip up ^ "Application number 004972212". Commons Wikimedia has created medias related to the Web 2.0. W 2. 0 / Social Medien / Social Networks.