What's Time is it nowWhat's the time, is it now?
Illusion of Time: What is Reality?
What makes time contentious? Always there, relentlessly advancing. The time flows, running like a stream. The time has a tendency, it develops further and further. There' s order in time, one thing at a time. There is a length of time, a measurable time span between occurrences. The time has a prileged present, only now it is reality. The time seems to be the universally valid backdrop through which all occurrences run, so that the sequence can be followed and the length of time can be determined.
Whether these are true facts of the realm of physics or synthetic constructions of our mindset is the issue. Perhaps time is not what time seems to be - this seamless entity without parts, the ever-present scene on which all events take place. ls time corporeal? Estimating time means feeling the web of it all.
In my TV show "Closer to Truth" I am interviewing poets and philosphers, and many claim that time is an Illusion. Why do you mean time isn't reality? "Huw Price, Cambridge University philosophical scholar, maintains that the three fundamental qualities of time come not from the corporeal realm but from our states of mind:
It is a present instant that is something particular; a kind of current or continuity; and an ultimate goal. The time is tensionless, all points are " realistic " in equal measure, so that past and present are no less realistic than the present. The time is, was, will, will? Are our feelings that time is flowing or passing and has a necessary meaning wrong?
"Either we can present our realities as a three-dimensional place where things happen over time," said Massachusetts Institute of Technology' physical scientist Max Tegmark, "or as a four-dimensional place where nothing happens ['block universe'] - and if it's really the second image, then it' really is an delusion, because there's nothing that changes; it's all there - past, present, tomorrow.
Our delusion is that the past has already occurred and the present does not yet begin to emerge, and that things are about to change. "Time is out there," said Andreas Albrecht, a philosophical cosmonologist at the University of California, Davis. So the time - the time we have known since we learnt to set time on a watch - seems to vanish if you studied physical science until you come to the theory of relativity. What is more, the time that we have known since we learnt to set time on a watch seems to vanish.
As Julian Barbour, a UK-based physicist, described time as "a sequence of images, a sequence of candid shots that continually transform into one another. We wouldn't have a clue about time without this one. "Isaac Newton, " Barbour said, "insisted that even if nothing at all had ever occurred, time would pass and that I believe it was totally false.
" For Barbour, the changes are true, but time is not. But time is only a mirror image of transformation. Our brain constructs a feeling of time from the changes as if it were flow. In his own words, all "evidence we have for time is coded in fixed configuration that we see or perceive in a subjective way, that all fit together to make time appear straight.
However, not all physical scientists are willing to put time into second-class state. Polkinghorne John, a scientist and Angelic religious person, awareness the motion and path of case are complex number and inexorable. It' s a'false argument', he said, to use the theory of relativeity to claim that time is an illusion'because no observers have information about a remote occurrence or the concurrence of different occurrences until they are clearly in the past of that one.
Photini Markopoulou-Kalamara, a theoretic physics expert at the Perimeter Institute, said: "I have the disturbing feeling that physics experts tell me that time is not reality. because time seems to be really there. is not the last hypothesis, rather than to say that time does not actually coexist.
" The time is a primary clash between the theory of relativity on the one hand and the theory of quantity on the other, whereas in the theory of quantity it is considered as a backdrop (and not as observable). Although time is psychological material for many physical scientists, time is not always material. Time is not a primary, non-reducible item or conceptual needed to build realities on the depths of nature's foundation.
is contraintuitive. Like Tegmark puts it: "There are so many things in physical science that we thought were basic, that turned out to be just delusions, that we question everything - even time. "What it is that is true will depend on what time is. Isn' time non-reducible, basic, an ultimative description of the basement world?
Is our feeling of the flow of time produced by our brain, which has developed for other ends, an illusion? What is it? Opinions are split, but many physics and philosophy scholars today suggest that time is not basic; rather, time arises from something essential - something non-temporal, something entirely different (perhaps something discrete, quantified, non-continuous, smooth).
Of course, the alternate is our shared intuition: time flows, the present is super-special as the only actual instant, and the profound character of our realities is that of becoming.