Wordpress Commercial useCommercial use of Wordpress
Hello Yes, you can use elemenor to build pages for your customers!
GPL and WordPress License Guide for Beginners
The majority of this free trial is published under a Free Software licence named GPL. And when the mediocre listens to Free software, he assumes that it means free work. Whilst this is often the case, the Free in Free Software actually relates to your liberties, not your purse. Within geeks circuits you will listen to Nüsse as I call free as in language and free as in beers.
" There are two types of money: the first relates to your privileges and the second to your cash. You have probably also learnt of the concept of open sources, which is often seen as just a cooperative way of developing where everyone has open code but it' s about more than just developing; it' s also about liberty.
It is not unusual for the concepts of Free Software and Open source to be used in an interchangeable manner. Open software definitions have developed to be very similar to Free Software definitions, and while they usually fit together like groundnut butters and chocolates, there are distinctions between Free Software and Open Software. Obviously, the Free Software Foundation favors the word Free Software because it stresses your freedom over a methodology.
The Free software Foundation admits, however, that: the difference . are small: Almost all free softwares are open sources, and almost all open sources are free. Speaking for myself, I like to call it Free Software for the same reason as the FSF, but you can call it whatever you want.
According to the Free Software Foundation Free Software warrants to you: Basically, there are many Free Software licences in general use, including: Every licence has its own conditions and may or may not be GPL compliant due to some particularly interesting and often criticised provisions in the GPL.
GPL was first published in 1989 by Richard Stallman and the Free software Foundation, which he established with the aim of protecting the freedom to make, change and redistribute free copies of distributed information under what he termed the copy-left conditions. The GPL is amazingly readable for a juridical paper, and anyone using the GPL licenced softwares should be able to see it or at least at least see it once.
In fact, the core of the GPL follows the "Four Freedoms" of the Free Software definition with the inclusion of copy-left. Obviously, we can all fall behind in the protection of our copyrights with our GPL sales argument number one but the GPL also ensures that free innovation is brought back into the fellowship for the benefit of all.
Better said, I've seen the unbelievable influence Free software has had on our whole life. WordPress, the free softwares program that currently operates about 18-20% of Web sites, has promoted an eco-system of designers and contractors who live off WordPress-related companies. Complimentary softwares are included in every computer and computer equipment you use on a regular basis and on every website you browse.
Under the GPL is Linux softwares, so if someone changes them and publishes changes to the Linux fellowship, the licence is passed on along with the changed softwares, so it must also be open sourced. The Free Software Foundation itself points out that the GPL is not suitable for everyone, and sometimes a more liberal open code licence suits better.
When you are a website user, it is good to know what your copyrights are with the piece of code that runs your website. When you use WordPress on your website, you need to know that no one can take it back or limit your options for improvement or enhancement.
There seems to be a continuous rumbling about the GPL from some part of the WordPress comunity. Matt Mullenweg established the WordPress Foundation to "ensure free, long-term accessibility to the supported WordPress programs " and, I believe, to make it very clear that WordPress is not a business, but a Free Source program with policies and regulations that are unique to any organization or individuals.
It' clear that the GPL is no laughing stock for Mr. Mullenweg, the people from Automattic and the WordPress Foundation, and it's one of the things I admire most about the WordPress work. Every piece of WordPress.org and WordPress.org software found in the plugins directory and the themes directory must be licenced under the GPL v. 2 or a compliant licence.
It makes sure that all the Wordpress.org softwares are free as in the language and free as in beers. Early this year, the WordPress Foundation approached some members of the WordPress Fellowship and told them that they could not voluntarily sign up or talk to WordCamps because they were selling topics or plug-ins that did not fully comply with the GPL or compliant licensing requirements.
So why should the WordPress Fellowship be so concerned about licencing? Now, WordPress. org says it very clearly on their license page: WordPress is released under the GPL for both convenience and idealism. The WordPress was created out of the above freedoms. b2/cafelog, the forerunner of the WordPress projects, was also an opensource project.
Because of its origin, WordPress is obliged to copy-left, but the GPL ideal is at the heart of the WordPress fellowship for many, and so am I, clearly close and dear. Where you shop, you may come across some WordPress plug-ins or topics that are not under the GPL or a compliant licence.
Leave and reread the licence to make sure you know your privileges. A few topics and plug-ins do not grant your permissions to run, view, modify, and share your work. Designers do this to help preserve their properties, but in this fellowship it gives me the willpower and there are certainly better ways to make a living with plug-ins and theming.
Also we buy and use several commercial plugs which are also licenced under the GPL. Obviously, if I upgrade or expand it and make it available to the fellowship, it must also be under the same or a compliant licence. Why do you charge for free softwares?
As a rule, Premium WordPress plug-in and themes developer sells you a licence code that gives you easy and fast entry to our automated upgrade and maintenance services. It should still work without this licence, but you won't be able to take advantage of an update that provides new functionality, troubleshooting, and safeguards. Whilst licensed softwares sound about as thrilling as drying paints, they are actually quite intriguing and touch our daily life.
There are also many really bright, fun and amusing people who are part of the Free Software motion, like Richard Stallman. However, I urge you to look up a little and make sure you know your licensing privileges. For more information about Free Software, the GPL and Licensing, please visit us:
And if you want to take a really enjoyable look at the roots of Linux and Free Software, you should watch the film Revolution OS (also on Netflix).